Factor Investing ETFs: Value, Momentum, Quality, Size, and Low Volatility Funds

Value Factor ETFs: Buying Stocks at a Discount

Value factor ETFs invest in stocks with low prices relative to fundamentals — low price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), or price-to-cash-flow ratios. The theory is that these undervalued stocks eventually revert to fair value, producing higher returns. The most popular value ETFs include VTV (Vanguard Value ETF, 0.04% ER) which tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, 0.19% ER), and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF, 0.24% ER) for small-cap value. More aggressive value ETFs include AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF, 0.25% ER) which uses a deeper value screen and adds a profitability filter. Value ETFs tend to outperform during economic recoveries and periods of rising interest rates. They underperform during technology-driven bull markets when growth stocks lead. From 2000-2007 (the lost decade for the S&P 500), VTV returned 12% annually while the S&P 500 returned -5%. From 2010-2020, growth stocks dominated and value ETFs significantly underperformed. Since 2021, value has made a strong comeback.

Momentum Factor ETFs: Riding the Trend

Momentum factor ETFs invest in stocks with the highest recent returns over a specific lookback period (typically 6-12 months). The theory is that stocks that have gone up tend to keep going up in the short to medium term, and stocks that have gone down tend to keep falling. Momentum is one of the strongest and most persistent factors across all asset classes. The flagship momentum ETF is MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, 0.15% ER). MTUM selects stocks with the highest momentum scores based on 6-month and 12-month price changes, excluding the most recent month (to avoid short-term reversals). The ETF rebalances semiannually. MTUM has returned approximately 13% annualized since its 2013 inception versus 12% for the S&P 500, but with higher volatility. Momentum works best in trending markets and can experience sharp reversals during market turning points. In 2009, momentum suffered a 60% drawdown from peak to trough during the market recovery when the worst performers suddenly rallied. Trend following is closely related to momentum.

Quality Factor ETFs: Profitable and Stable Companies

Quality factor ETFs invest in companies with strong profitability, stable earnings, low debt, and efficient management. Quality is measured by metrics like return on equity (ROE), gross profitability, debt-to-equity ratio, and earnings stability. The idea is that high-quality companies are less likely to go bankrupt and more likely to generate consistent returns. The flagship quality ETF is QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF, 0.15% ER). QUAL selects stocks with the highest quality scores based on ROE, debt-to-equity, and earnings variability. Other quality ETFs include SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF, 0.15% ER) and DURA (VanEck Morningstar Durable Growth ETF, 0.29% ER). Quality factor ETFs have lower volatility than the broad market and tend to hold up better during downturns. From 2007-2009, QUAL lost 35% versus the S&P 500's 55% loss. Quality stocks tend to underperform during speculative bubbles when lower-quality companies with higher growth prospects lead the market. They are excellent core holdings for conservative investors.

Size Factor ETFs: Small-Cap Advantage

The size factor is based on the academic finding that small-cap stocks have historically outperformed large-cap stocks by approximately 2% annually. The premium is concentrated in the smallest companies and is most pronounced in the small-cap value segment. Size ETFs include VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, 0.05% ER), IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF, 0.19% ER), and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF, 0.25% ER) for a value tilt. IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, 0.06% ER) tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 index, which has a profitability screen. AVUV combines size with value and profitability screens for a more targeted small-cap value exposure. Small-cap ETFs tend to outperform during economic expansions with rising GDP and underperform during recessions. They have higher volatility and lower liquidity than large-cap ETFs. Small-cap value specifically has been the single best-performing factor over the long term according to Fama-French data, returning 4-6% annually above the market. Guide to small-cap investing.

Low Volatility Factor ETFs: Less Risk, Similar Returns

The low volatility factor (also called minimum volatility or low beta) is based on the finding that stocks with lower price volatility have produced higher risk-adjusted returns than the broader market. This seems counterintuitive (less risk should mean less return) but the low volatility anomaly is well-documented. It is explained by investor preferences for lottery-like high-volatility stocks, which drives up their prices and depresses future returns. The flagship low volatility ETF is USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF, 0.15% ER). USMV selects stocks with the lowest absolute volatility and optimizes the portfolio to minimize overall volatility. Other low vol ETFs include SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF, 0.10% ER) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF, 0.20% ER). Low volatility ETFs lost only 8% in 2022 versus the S&P 500's 18% loss. Over the long term, USMV has returned approximately 10.5% annualized versus 11% for the S&P 500, but with 20% less volatility. The risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio) are meaningfully better. Understanding risk-adjusted returns.

Multi-Factor ETFs: Combining Factor Exposures

Multi-factor ETFs combine two or more factors in a single fund, aiming to diversify across factor exposures and smooth the performance cycles of individual factors. Examples include: JPGE (JPMorgan Diversified Factor ETF, 0.30% ER) which targets value, momentum, quality, and low volatility; LRGF (iShares US Equity Factor ETF, 0.08% ER) which combines value, momentum, quality, size, and low volatility; and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index ETF, 0.25% ER) which weights stocks by fundamental metrics (sales, cash flow, dividends, buybacks) rather than market cap. Multi-factor ETFs provide a diversified factor allocation in one fund, eliminating the need to manage multiple single-factor ETFs. The trade-off is less control over individual factor weights and higher expense ratios than single-factor ETFs. For most investors, a multi-factor ETF is a simpler way to implement factor investing than building a portfolio of individual factor ETFs. Research shows that multi-factor strategies have lower tracking error and more consistent outperformance than single-factor funds. Multi-factor ETFs often blur the line between active and passive.

What is factor investing in ETFs?

Factor investing targets specific characteristics (factors) that academic research has shown to produce higher risk-adjusted returns. The five main factors are value, momentum, quality, size, and low volatility. Factor ETFs are funds that systematically select stocks based on these characteristics, allowing investors to tilt their portfolios toward these return drivers. Unlike passive index ETFs that weight stocks by market capitalization, factor ETFs use rules-based screens to overweight stocks with desired factor exposures.

Which factor ETFs have the best returns?

Historically, small-cap value has produced the highest return premium at 4-6% annually. AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) has been one of the best-performing factor ETFs since its 2019 inception. Momentum has also delivered strong returns, with MTUM outperforming the S&P 500 in most years. However, past performance does not guarantee future results, and factor premiums can underperform for extended periods (value lagged from 2010-2020). Diversifying across multiple factors is more reliable than betting on any single factor.

Are factor ETFs better than broad market ETFs?

Factor ETFs can provide higher returns than broad market ETFs over the long term, but they come with higher fees, higher volatility, and the risk of extended underperformance. A broad market ETF like VOO is a "bet on capitalism" — you will match the market's return minus 0.03%. A factor ETF is a "bet on a specific strategy" — you may outperform or underperform. The academic evidence supports factor premiums, but they are not guaranteed. A sensible approach is to use broad market ETFs as your core and allocate 20-40% to factor ETFs for potential outperformance. This gives you market returns with a factor tilt.

How do I build a factor investing portfolio with ETFs?

A simple factor-tilted portfolio might be: 40% VOO (S&P 500), 20% AVUV (small-cap value), 20% QUAL (quality), 10% MTUM (momentum), and 10% USMV (low volatility). Or simplify with a multi-factor ETF like JPGE (JPMorgan Diversified Factor ETF) at 40% as a single-factor allocation, plus VOO and VXUS for broad market exposure. Keep factor ETFs in tax-advantaged accounts if possible, as they have higher turnover and may generate more taxable distributions. For taxable accounts, consider holding factor ETFs with lower turnover (like quality or low volatility ETFs) rather than momentum or small-cap value which trade more frequently.

Related Resources